Username:

Password:

Fargot Password? / Help

Tag: Health & Fitness

1

Coroner Says Actor Corey Haim Died From Pneumonia

Actor Corey Haim died from pneumonia complicated by an enlarged heart, bad lungs and narrowed blood vessels, while drugs found in his system played no role in his death, the Los Angeles County coroner said Tuesday (See our Article  R.I.P. Corey Haim). Haim, 38, died of natural causes from "community-acquired pneumonia" along with lung, heart and blood vessel problems, according to an autopsy report. Low levels of eight drugs, including both prescription and over-the-counter medications, were found in his system along with marijuana, coroner's spokesman Craig Harvey said. "But nothing was at a level that would have contributed to his death," Harvey said. They included common cold and flu medications, such as ibuprofen and a cough-suppressant, he said. Haim, who had struggled with drug problems throughout his life, died March 10 after collapsing in his mother's apartment. Haim was ill with flulike symptoms before his death, and police said he was taking over-the-counter and prescription medications. "The pneumonia is what killed him," Harvey said. Mark Heaslip, the actor's agent, did not return a phone message seeking comment Tuesday. California Attorney General Jerry Brown said in April that Haim employed "doctor shopping" to obtain 553 prescription pills in the two months before his death. Brown called Haim - the star of 1980s films such as "The Lost Boys" and "License to Drive" - a poster child for prescription drug abuse. He said Haim obtained powerful sedatives such as Valium and Xanax and painkillers such as Vicodin and Oxycontin. However, no Oxycontin was found in his body, Harvey said. He noted that Haim's heart was abnormally large and factored in his death. "His heart was 530 grams. The average normal heart weighs 300 grams," Harvey said. Haim also had damaged lungs and arteriosclerosis of his coronary arteries, with some vessels 50-percent and even 75-percent blocked. Harvey said it was unclear how long Haim had suffered from the medical problems or the pneumonia or whether earlier treatment might have saved him.
0.0/60votes
Voting statistics:
RatePercentageVotes
60%0
50%0
40%0
30%0
20%0
10%0
0

SURVEY SAYS: Females Who Engage in Barebacking At Higher Rates For STDs Than Gay Men

A new survey by the NYC Department of Health found that women make their male partners use condoms during anal sex far less frequently than gay men. Of the more than 100,000 NYC women who engage in anal sex each year, only 23% use condoms compared to 61% of men who have sex with men. The report also found that women who engage in unprotected anal sex get tested for HIV much less frequently than women who always use condoms during anal play: 35% versus 63%. Unprotected anal intercourse is more frequent among younger females and those with many partners. 11% of Women 18 to 24 had unprotected anal sex compared to 2% of women 45 to 64. Of women with three or more sexual partners, 15% had unprotected anal sex in the past year versus 4% of those with one or more partner. Broken down by race, 8% of Asian, 7% of white, 6% of Hispanic, and 4% of black women had unprotected anal sex in the last year. Anal  sex carries a 30 times greater risk of HIV infection than vaginal intercourse. The anal membrane is much more susceptible to small rips that facilitate infections compared to vaginal or oral sex. Now that more and more women are having anal sex, they need to be aware of the inherent risks and understand the importance of using protection to limit the risks of spreading STDs.
0.0/60votes
Voting statistics:
RatePercentageVotes
60%0
50%0
40%0
30%0
20%0
10%0
1

Get Your Fleet On: "elective rectal cleansing" Now For Men!

Now that we as a culture have become inured to marketing for such once-taboo topics as erectile dysfunction, personal lubrication and manscaping, get ready for the ad world to literally hit bottom. As in, recreational enemas. You still there? No, we’re not pulling this one out of our butt. C.B. Fleet Inc., the Lynchburg, Virginia, company synonymous with at-home disposable colonics, debuts a new product this month specifically for what they’ve termed “elective rectal cleansing.” And, since any new product requires an advertising campaign, Fleet is buying space starting in June in the national gay monthly Out as well as 10 regional publications and various popular websites aimed at gay and lesbian readers. Fleet also will try online ads on general-interest health websites like MensHealth.com and Prevention.com, “but certainly, it’s an easy and efficient target to reach LGBT media,” said Emily Klopp, senior brand manager for Fleet Naturals. “We’ve always known that some of our consumers were using Fleet enemas for reasons other than to relieve constipation, so we wanted to develop a product that would meet the needs of those users and provide them with a safe way to cleanse and frequently if desired,” Klopp said. Between Fleet and private label brands, consumers buy about $30 million in enemas annually. Fleet dominates the market, though because it's a private company, it won't disclose specific sales figures. Fleet's new version hits shelves at CVS drug stores and Target this month, followed by Walgreens next month and Rite-Aid in June. Wal-Mart is the only major retailer so far to balk at carrying it, Klopp said. The company commissioned polling firm Harris Interactive last year to research the market potential and found that 3.7 percent of the general population had used an enema to “electively rectally cleanse” in the prior year. A study focusing specifically on gay and bisexual men found 21 percent of them had done so. Yet Harris found the two populations do so for different reasons: 80 percent of the general population said they used an enema for “health and well-being” while 87 percent of gay and bisexual men said they did so as a precursor to “anal intimacy.” About 38 percent of the general population said they used enemas for “anal intimacy”; respondents were permitted to select more than one answer. To market the product in a manner that doesn’t gross anyone out, Fleet turned to Euro RSCG. The ad firm produced a series of print ads showing, for instance, a donkey–A.K.A. ass–above the tagline: “Keep it clean. Naturally.” Gay marketing expert Mike Wilke gave Fleet kudos for even acknowledging this market when, not long ago, it might have been too icky to embrace. “Especially because we’re talking about a company that doesn’t do a lot of advertising to begin with, it’s meaningful that they’re advertising at all, that they’re advertising in a charming way and they’re going after a market that companies don’t always go after,” said Wilke. While Fleet is clearly embracing the implicit pre-anal-sex element of the new product for gay and bisexual male customers, they also believe the “health and well-being” market is the bigger potential opportunity. “We ran focus groups and one person said it helped him think clearly, that he needs to cleanse daily to get thru the day,” Klopp said. “Without it, he said he feels muddled.” Others claimed electively cleansing helped with weight loss and acne, although Klopp is quick to note that there is no research to support any such health benefits. The packaging makes a similar disclaimer. The Fleet Naturals line appears in a mocha-colored box and has important differences from its famous green-boxed forebear. Whereas the traditional enema contains a laxative because it is chiefly intended to relieve constipation, Fleet Naturals has no active ingredient but contains aloe to enhance the sought-after fresh sensation. The original version used a petroleum-based lubricant on its tip, but the new one uses a water-based lube, a nod to the fact that it may be deployed in close proximity to sexual intercourse with latex condoms that can break when they interact with petroleum products. One of Fleet’s arguments for its Naturals line is that it is safer for regular use than using the laxative-inducing version and more effective and hygienic than other methods people use to anally douche. “They’re bringing a new SKU onto the shelf in their product category by having something that’s distinct in the marketplace,” Wilke said. “It may be hard to grow the market but they can steal a share from another aspect of the category. The market can also be people who are using showerheads.” Indeed, Klopp insisted that’s precisely the goal. “I think it would be a tough sell to tell someone who has never rectally cleansed before that they need to try it,” she said. “That could be an objective for Year 2 or 3.” Heh heh. She said the number 2. To see the ads for the new Fleet product, click here, here, and here.
Steve Friess is a freelance writer based in Las Vegas. He writes the blog www.VegasHappensHere.com.
0.0/60votes
Voting statistics:
RatePercentageVotes
60%0
50%0
40%0
30%0
20%0
10%0
1

Bareback Porn Ban In California Doesn't Cut It In Court

In a welcome rebuke to AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF), an organization whose protest signs featuring Lifestyles Condoms were much in evidence at a protest march at Hustler Hollywood earlier this fall, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has dismissed the petition for, apparently, a writ of mandamus filed by AHF in its attempt to force the Los Angeles Department of Public Health (LADPH) to require that adult performers use condoms during every sex scene. AHF's petition asked the court to direct the LADPH to "discharge its ... duty to combat an acknowledged epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases stemming from production of hardcore pornography" by requiring condom use or taking other appropriate measures. According to an article in the Los Angeles Times by Kimi Yoshino, Judge David P. Yaffe told AHF that it is the health department, not the courts, which is responsible for overseeing health threats to county residents, and that the LADPH has "broad discretion" in how it performs that duty. AHF's petition accused the health department of failing to act to deter what it has described as an epidemic of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among adult performers, even as the health department itself has backed off somewhat from the misleading statistics it had earlier released about the infection rate among the performer population. Indeed, where Yoshino had once cited hard numbers on positive STI results reported to the health department, her statement in the current article, still employing the department's flawed statistics, says, "county health officials released data that showed 18 HIV cases and more than 3,700 cases of chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis had been reported since 2004 by a San Fernando Valley-based clinic that mainly serves the porn industry." However, according to Brooke Hunter, who runs the day-to-day operations at AIM Healthcare Foundation, the cited statistics are terribly misleading because they include not only the adult performers which AIM tests, but also the non-performer "civilians" who also use AIM's testing services. "We have draw stations in every state in the United States, and we test adult industry and civilians alike," Hunter told AVN. "We are unique in that we do test the adult film industry, but we are not unique in the fact that we do what most HIV and STD testing and screening facilities do: We test people who come in and ask. We don't turn someone away, saying, 'We only serve the adult industry.' And sometimes a result comes up positive for those people, so there you go. When you're testing for something, there's a possibility that it comes up, but as far as the industry as a whole, it still stands: There have been five performers [who have tested HIV-positive] during the incident in 2004; that's it." Hunter also lauded the Free Speech Coalition for its recently-released Bloodborne Pathogens Plan, which was formulated by healthcare professionals as well as AIM founder Dr. Sharon Mitchell. "It was a lot of painstaking labor that everybody put in that, and it's good," Hunter said. "When people not involved in the industry, who don't know its day-to-day life, try to meddle in an area in which they're not directly involved, I think it looks bad for them. He [AHF president Michael Weinstein] has gotten involved with the Shelly Lubbens and these crazies and [former performer] Darren James, and I don't understand why he felt the need to regulate our industry, and the only reason I would think would be an ulterior motive. I bet you had this decision gone the other way, we would have seen a rapid Christmas sale for Lifestyle condoms; it woulde be all over the website: 'Get your Lifestyle condoms here now that they're mandatory,' and I bet he's got a boilerplate letter ready to go to all the production companies, going, 'Well, now that this law is in place, you can purchase your Lifestyle condoms here, and I would be happy to give you a 20 percent break on the price.'" AHF has reportedly put Darren James, who is allegedly responsible for the 2004 HIV transmission to four other performers, on its payroll. It is unclear what James' duties will be for AHF other than as a spokesperson for their mandatory condom campaign. Indeed, AHF spokeswoman Lori Yeghiayan claimed today on the LA Weekly blog that the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (CalOSHA) already has the power to require condom use by adult performers, most of whom are independent contractors. "In our view, the current regulation, which is about preventing the transmission of blood-borne pathogens in a work place—most often in a hospital or medical setting—also applies to the porn industry," Yeghiayan told LA Weekly reporter Dennis Romero. "We're asking for compliance." AHF has made frequent statements to this effect, ignoring the fact that making sexually explicit content is a First Amendment-protected activity, and it is the industry's position that requiring condoms during sex scenes would severely affect the erotic message of its products. On the whole, Hunter was overjoyed with Judge Yaffee's decision. "The judge's response is fantastic, and I frankly would have been surprised had they ruled any other way," Hunter said. "The people who are trying to impose the law on condoms are not people who are performers, producers or directors; they are someone else with an agenda." "It's a good thing," she continued. "Let us continue to run our business ourselves. We are safer. It's much safer to work within the adult industry than it is to go out to a bar, have a couple of cocktails and end up in bed with somebody." In a press release today, AHF vowed to appeal Judge Yaffee's ruling. FROM AVN NEWS
0.0/60votes
Voting statistics:
RatePercentageVotes
60%0
50%0
40%0
30%0
20%0
10%0
0

Is Crystal Uncool?

methAs anyone who went clubbing or to one of those multi-party Circuit weekends in the late ’90s or early ’00s knows, Miss Tina (as crystal methamphetamine is known among its gay users) was an essential part of staying awake and having sex--plenty of sex, much of it unsafe.

But how much is tina use ebbing among the affluent gay men who were at the forefront of the epidemic--and, not incidentally, have been at the forefront of efforts to stop its rampant use? Anecdotal evidence points to programs that began with activist Peter Staley’s bus and telephone-kiosk ads in New York City’s Chelsea and Hell’s Kitchen neighborhoods as making tina uncool (or at least less cool). But how effective have they been?

For those who track crystal meth usage among gay and bisexual men, once again, knowledge is power. But a lack of coordinated information as well reluctance on the part of state and federal funders to acknowledge the link between drug use and sexuality often hinders or dilutes their efforts.

logo_edgesanfrancisco_webRead Scott Stiffler's Complete Story: Is Crystal Uncool? Gay Men’s Love Affair With Tina May Be O-Vah at San Francisco Edge

0.0/60votes
Voting statistics:
RatePercentageVotes
60%0
50%0
40%0
30%0
20%0
10%0
0

Suck More Cock = -HIV

space-003

Some HIV-negative men in long term relationships with HIV-positive men have an antibody response in saliva which may inhibit HIV infection, report Swedish researchers in an article published online ahead of print in AIDS. This is the first time that such a response has been described in saliva, and may help explain why infection through oral sex is somewhat infrequently reported even in serodiscordant couples.

While it is well established that while HIV infection during fellatio and other types of oral sex can and does happen, the number of infections that can be attributed to oral sex is relatively small in comparison with the number of times that unprotected oral sex is practiced. One reason is that saliva contains enzymes which partially inhibit HIV infection.

Moreover, a number of studies, most famously among commercial sex workers in Kenya, have identified individuals who have had unprotected vaginal sex on many occasions and are likely to have been repeatedly exposed to HIV, but who have not been infected. It is thought that, through repeated exposure, these individuals have acquired a stronger immune response which makes HIV infection less likely. Different researchers have investigated a number of different markers of this immune response, including the presence of specific antibodies (IgA1) which may neutralise HIV, and HIV-specific CD4 cell responses.

Klara Hasselrot and colleagues from the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm wished to investigate whether in long term relationships where one partner has HIV, the HIV-negative partner develops IgA1 antibodies in saliva that would help inhibit HIV infection during oral sex.

They recruited 25 HIV-negative men who were in a relationship of at least six months duration with an HIV-positive man. In addition, 22 HIV-negative men who were not in a serodiscordant relationship were recruited at a blood donor clinic to act as controls.

Klara Hasselrot told aidsmap.com that the study participants’ questionnaires showed that 24 of the 25 men had performed unprotected receptive oral sex in the previous six months. For 21 men, this was with their HIV-positive partner, but for three men it was with casual partners of unknown HIV status. Just three men also reported unprotected receptive anal intercourse.

Moreover, analysis of the medical records of the HIV-positive partners showed that whilst most were on treatment at the time of the study, only two had been on antiretroviral treatment with undetectable viral loads for the entire length of their relationship. The researchers judge that this means that, with two exceptions, all HIV-negative partners have probably been exposed to HIV at some point.

Analysis of whole saliva samples showed that saliva from 15 of the men in serodiscordant relationships had HIV neutralising capacity. This was also the case for six of the control group, which confirms saliva’s usual HIV inhibiting activity.

Further tests were performed on samples of the IgA1 antibodies only. In these tests, antibodies from 13 of the serodiscordant partners, but none of the control samples, neutralised HIV.

The researchers believe that repeated exposure to HIV during oral sex produces this specific immune response in saliva. Moreover they argue that the inhibitory effect of IgA1 is likely to be a significant contributor to neutralisation in the whole-saliva samples. Looking at the 13 men whose IgA1 was able to neutralise HIV, they re-tested saliva samples from which IgA1 had been removed. Only five of these samples had neutralising activity.

condoms-002Two years after enrolment into the study, new samples were taken and tested. The situation was unchanged for almost all serodiscordant partners (although one man’s saliva showed neutralising capacity for the first time, and another man lost this ability). Moreover, they all remained HIV-negative.

The researchers also found that men who had neutralising capacity in their saliva tended to have partners with a higher viral load than men who did not have this capacity. This would suggest that neutralising capacity is determined by the amount of exposure to virus.

The researchers conclude that “unprotected oral sex evokes a salivary IgA1-mediated HIV-neutralizing response that persists over time during continuous exposure in uninfected male partners of infected men”.

Reference
Hasselrot K et al. Oral HIV-exposure elicits mucosal HIV-neutralizing antibodies in uninfected men who have sex with men. AIDS (online edition), 2009.

0.0/60votes
Voting statistics:
RatePercentageVotes
60%0
50%0
40%0
30%0
20%0
10%0
0

HIV could be eliminated in a decade

The virus that causes AIDS could theoretically be eliminated in a decade if all people living in countries with high infection rates are regularly tested and treated, according to a new mathematical model.

It is an intriguing solution to end the AIDS epidemic. But it is based on assumptions rather than data, and is riddled with logistical problems. The research was published online Tuesday in the medical journal, The Lancet.

"It's quite a startling result," said Charlie Gilks, an AIDS treatment expert at the World Health Organization and one of the paper's authors. "In a relatively short amount of time, we could potentially knock the epidemic on its head."

Gilks and colleagues used data from South Africa and Malawi. In their model, people were voluntarily tested each year and immediately given drugs if they tested positive for HIV, regardless of whether they were sick.

Within 10 years, HIV infections dropped by 95 percent. Other initiatives like safe sex education and male circumcision were also used.

The strategy would cut the estimated number of AIDS deaths between 2008 and 2050 by about half, from about 8.7 million to 3.9 million, leaving only sporadic HIV cases.

Experts think the strategy's cost would peak at about $3.4 billion a year, though expenses would fall after an initial investment.

"This is certainly beyond the bounds of the current infrastructure for many countries, but that is not a reason not to think big," said Myron Cohen, of the University of North Carolina, who has done similar research. He was not involved in the WHO study.

Only 3 million people are currently on AIDS drugs. Nearly 7 million people are still awaiting treatment, and about 3 million more people were infected last year. Worldwide, WHO guesses that about 33 million people have HIV.

Increasing access to testing and drugs would stretch already weak health systems in Africa, which has most of the world's HIV cases.

"This is not like giving someone a Tylenol," said Jennifer Kates, director of HIV policy for the Kaiser Family Foundation in Washington, DC. Once people start AIDS drugs, they must continue indefinitely. "The idea should be explored, but it's a huge leap," Kates said.

Handing out AIDS drugs to everyone who tests positive could also worsen drug resistance.

In addition, doctors don't know if it's safe to take AIDS drugs for decades; the oldest drug combinations have only been around for about a dozen years.

Other experts questioned whether the strategy might infringe on patient's rights. Once people test positive for HIV, they would be advised to start treatment, even if they weren't sick.

That would benefit the community, but not necessarily the patients themselves. AIDS drugs come with side effects including vomiting, liver failure, and heart attacks.

WHO emphasized that the study findings do not signal a policy change. "This is only a theoretical exercise," said Dr. Kevin De Cock, director of WHO's HIV/AIDS department. He said WHO would hold a meeting next year to study the idea more closely.

0.0/60votes
Voting statistics:
RatePercentageVotes
60%0
50%0
40%0
30%0
20%0
10%0
0

AIDS Virus Is 100 years old

Study Finds AIDS Virus Is a Century Old

A Genetic Analysis of Two Old Strains Pushed Back the Estimated Origin of HIV to 1908

NEW YORK (AP) - The AIDS virus has been circulating among people for about 100 years, decades longer than scientists had thought, a new study suggests. Genetic analysis pushes the estimated origin of HIV back to between 1884 and 1924, with a more focused estimate at 1908. Previously, scientists had estimated the origin at around 1930. AIDS wasn't recognized formally until 1981 when it got the attention of public health officials in the United States. The new result is "not a monumental shift, but it means the virus was circulating under our radar even longer than we knew," says Michael Worobey of the University of Arizona, an author of the new work. The results appear in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature. Researchers note that the newly calculated dates fall during the rise of cities in Africa, and they suggest urban development may have promoted HIV's initial establishment and early spread. Scientists say HIV descended from a chimpanzee virus that jumped to humans in Africa, probably when people butchered chimps. Many individuals were probably infected that way, but so few other people caught the virus that it failed to get a lasting foothold, researchers say. But the growth of African cities may have changed that by putting lots of people close together and promoting prostitution, Worobey suggested. "Cities are kind of ideal for a virus like HIV," providing more chances for infected people to pass the virus to others, he said. Perhaps a person infected with the AIDS virus in a rural area went to what is now Kinshasa, Congo, "and now you've got the spark arriving in the tinderbox," Worobey said. Key to the new work was the discovery of an HIV sample that had been taken from a woman in Kinshasa in 1960. It was only the second such sample to be found from before 1976; the other was from 1959, also from Kinshasa. Researchers took advantage of the fact that HIV mutates rapidly. So two strains from a common ancestor quickly become less and less alike in their genetic material over time. That allows scientists to "run the clock backward" by calculating how long it would take for various strains to become as different as they are observed to be. That would indicate when they both sprang from their most recent common ancestor. The new work used genetic data from the two old HIV samples plus more than 100 modern samples to create a family tree going back to these samples' last common ancestor. Researchers got various answers under various approaches for when that ancestor virus appeared, but the 1884-to-1924 bracket is probably the most reliable, Worobey said. The new work is "clearly an improvement" over the previous estimate of around 1930, said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in Bethesda, Md. His institute helped pay for the work. Fauci described the advance as "a fine-tuning."
Experts say it's no surprise that HIV circulated in humans for about 70 years before being recognized. An infection usually takes years to produce obvious symptoms, a lag that can mask the role of the virus, and it would have infected relatively few Africans early in its spread, they said. Read More

One in 10 Men Has Multiple Sex Partners

0.0/60votes
Voting statistics:
RatePercentageVotes
60%0
50%0
40%0
30%0
20%0
10%0