Username:

Password:

Fargot Password? / Help

Tag: prostitution

0

Entrapment ?

Police Sting in Video Store: Gay Entrapment?

A gay New Yorker says he was entrapped and arrested for prostitution by the NYPD as he browsed at a local video shop. The cops say the man offered sexual services to an undercover officer for a fee.

The Gay City News related both sides of the story in an Oct. 30 article.
Robert Pinter, 52, was at Blue Door Video in the East Village when, he says, an attractive young man came up to him. Describing the young Asian-American, Pinter said, "He is smiling, he’s really a cute guy, very friendly." Added Pinter, "He initiated the conversation and drove the whole conversation." Pinter’s side of the story is that the young man claimed to be 29 and consented to a sexual encounter with Pinter, offering his car as a place for the rendezvous. As the men left the video store, Pinter said, his new acquaintance made a monetary offer for the encounter that Pinter says they had already agreed would take place. Said Pinter, "He sort of threw in ’Oh, I want to pay you $50 to suck your dick.’ "When he offered me the money my first thought was he wanted me to pay him the money.  "When I realized that it wasn’t that way I thought it wasn’t logical." By then, it was too late: as the men stepped out onto the sidewalk, a number of police officers appeared. Said Pinter, "At first I thought it was a gang because they didn’t say anything, they didn’t identify themselves as police." 

Added Pinter, "They took my bag, started going through my possessions.  "I must have asked them four or five times, ’Why are you putting me under arrest?’" Pinter had to wait, handcuffed, in a van as the group of policemen continued their work at various spots in Manhattan. Then he was booked and charged with prostitution before being arraigned the day after his arrest, the Gay City News item said. Pinter was advised by a lawyer from the Legal Aid Society to plead guilty to the lesser charge of disorderly conduct; he received an order to go to classes on health, and fined. The article said that the Manhattan South Vice Enforcement Squad had made other arrests at the video store during 2008, and have made similar arrests in at least one other shop since 2005.

At the start of this year, Blue Door Video was the site of ten arrests for alleged prostitution; the shop closed temporarily last summer. The article said that one aspect of the arrests was consistent across the board: the arrests took place after the undercover officer broached the subject of payment. The article quoted Legal Aid senior staff attorney Russell Novack, who said that some of the arrests at Blue Door were of European men. Said Novack, "I really don’t think that European tourists are coming down to the Bowery to be prostitutes." Added the lawyer, "The police send undercovers in there to solicit guys."Other men allegedly guilty of prostituting themselves at Blue Door included a 19-year-old from Virginia and a California man, aged 53. The article said that all ten men arrested in Jan. and Feb. of this year did as Pinter did, and pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct, because that was the least expensive way both in terms of time and money to clear the matter up. The records of all those arrests will be sealed in 2010, the article said, disappearing from public view. But the question is whether the police are luring and then entrapping gay men in the first place. Said Legal Aid supervising attorney Linda Poust Lopez, "You really do have to walk away" in order not to get arrested and charged with prostitution in such a case. "Say very clearly ’No, thank you’ and walk away," Lopez advised.
In response to inquiries about the arrests, NYPD spokesperson Paul Browne wrote in an email message, "Robert Pinter was arrested for prostitution on October 10 after he asked the officer how much money he had, and then offered to perform oral sex on the officer for $50." Continued the email, "The location, Blue Door Video, has been the subject of prostitution complaints previously.  "It’s currently enjoined by the court from conducting, permitting, or promoting prostitution." Added the message, "Blue Door Video and the landlord paid $2,500 in settlement costs stemming from the injunction."
LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS ON WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THIS CASE
 

0.0/60votes
Voting statistics:
RatePercentageVotes
60%0
50%0
40%0
30%0
20%0
10%0
0

Prostitution May Be Legal In San Francisco

San Francisco may decriminalize prostitution

(San Francisco, California) In this live-and-let-live town, where medical marijuana clubs do business next to grocery stores and an annual fair celebrates sadomasochism, hustlers and female prostitutes could soon walk the streets without fear of arrest.

San Francisco would become the first major U.S. city to decriminalize prostitution if voters next month approve Proposition K - a measure that forbids local authorities from investigating, arresting or prosecuting anyone for selling sex.

The ballot question technically would not legalize prostitution since state law still prohibits it, but the measure would eliminate the power of local law enforcement officials to go after prostitutes. Proponents say the measure will free up $11 million the police spend each year arresting prostitutes and allow them to form collectives. “It will allow workers to organize for our rights and for our safety,” said Patricia West, 22, who said she has been selling sex for about a year by placing ads on the Internet. She moved to San Francisco in May from Texas to work on Proposition K. Even in tolerant San Francisco - where the sadomasochism fair draws more than 400,000 tourists and a pornographic video company is housed in a former armory - the measure faces an uphill battle, with much of the political establishment opposing it. Some form of prostitution is already legal in two states. Brothels are allowed in rural counties in Nevada. And Rhode Island permits the sale of sex behind closed doors between consulting adults, but it prohibits street prostitution and brothels. In 2004, almost two-thirds of voters in nearby Berkeley rejected decriminalization. But proponents of Proposition K say their proposal has a better shot in San Francisco, which they believe is more sexually liberal than the city across the bay. After all, the world’s oldest profession has long been established here. During the Gold Rush, the neighborhood closest to the piers was a seedy pleasure center of sex, gambling and drinking known as the Barbary Coast. These days, on certain corners, prostitutes sell their bodies day and night, ducking into doorways and alleys when police pass by. One recent afternoon in the Mission District, six prostitutes were plying their trade on a single block. Police made 1,583 prostitution arrests in 2007 and expect to make a similar number this year. But the district attorney’s office says most defendants are fined, placed in diversion programs or both. Fewer than 5 percent get prosecuted for solicititation, which is a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail. Proposition K has been endorsed by the local Democratic Party. But the mayor, district attorney, police department and much of the business community oppose the idea, contending it would increase street prostitution, allow pimps the run of neighborhoods and hamper the fight against sex trafficking, which would remain illegal because it involves forcing people into the sex trade. The San Francisco Chronicle editorialized against the measure, saying it could make the city a magnet for prostitution. If the the proposal passes, “we wouldn’t be able to investigate prostitution, and it’s going to be pretty difficult for us to locate these folks who are victims of trafficking otherwise,” said Capt. Al Pardini, head of the police department’s vice unit. “It’s pretty rare that we get a call that says: ‘I’m a victim of human trafficking’ or ‘I suspect human trafficking in my neighborhood.’” The proposition would also prohibit police from accepting federal or state funds for sex trafficking investigations that involve racial profiling. Such investigations often arise from raids on brothels that advertise as Asian massage parlors. “We feel that repressive policies don’t help trafficking victims, and that human rights-based approaches, including decriminalization, are actually more effective,” said Carol Leigh, co-founder of the Bay Area Sex Workers Advocacy Network and a longtime advocate for prostitutes’ rights. But San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris said the ballot question mistakenly assumes prostitution is a victimless crime. “The crime of prostitution does not exist by itself,” Harris said. “Along with it come pimps, johns and other crimes that really impact the safety of neighborhoods.” If the measure passes, supporters say, prostitutes would not feel the need for pimps as protection. But opponents insist it would embolden pimps who trap drug addicts into prostitution by plying them with drugs. “The proponents usually paint a fairly rosy picture of two consenting adults and a monetary exchange at the end,” Pardini said. “They don’t factor in the people that are being exploited and people that are being controlled, the ones manipulated both physically and chemically.”
0.0/60votes
Voting statistics:
RatePercentageVotes
60%0
50%0
40%0
30%0
20%0
10%0
Pages:12